Reviewer Name: Sonia Aguiar

Name of Author under Review: Alison T.

Title of Work Reviewed: Major Assignment # 4, Draft #1

Date 09/12/2020

 1. In your own words, fully and with precision, describe what the assignment is asking the writer (your partner) to do?  Please use your own words rather than merely quote from the assignment. And please use the checklist as reference.

A: This assignment is tasking my classmate of chosing a genre of composition to work with explaining why she has chosen that particular genre, what was her theory of writing coming into English 101, and  how it evolved. She is asked to revisit her past writing and to quote from our text book as well as any other used sources, thus explaining what is her theory of writing now, and what has contributed the most for her evolution in writing. Lastly she's asked to explain how will she use her theory in the future. 

2. To what extent has your partner met the expectations of the assignment?  Please pick a passage as illustration and describe what works well there, referring to the assignment checklist.

A: I feel that Alissa did an okay job developing the required assignment. It is clear she chose a letter as a genre. She revisited her  previous work brought quotations and explains how her theory has evolved.

3. What area needs more work?  Why?  Please pick a passage as illustration, and describe what is not working, referring to the assignment checklist.

A: I would personally revisit the introduction section, and conclusion section, adding another paragraph to better explain why she is writing to her self. Also, work cited list? 

''English 101 is to help you not only develop a theory of writing But improve your writing skills.''

4. Please indicate TWO questions about the draft and at least ONE suggestion for ways to improve it.

A: Why exactly did you chose a letter?

What has contributed the most for your theory of writing?

I feel the paper was a good read overall, but it lacked more explaining of key-terms. I didn't understand the bullet points, it seems something was left behind or unsaid. Overall I would have revisited all sections, make sure the wording is close to perfect, that no words are missing (spelling check). Include works cited. Other than that, it was a great final effort from Alison. Good job.

'' I would use my understanding g or rhetoric choices''